I’ve given up on Twitter for a bit. I found that I was spending a lot of time looking at it and I have many other things to read.
In our house we get the following in print:
- The Irish Times (most days, sometimes two copies due to an annoying inability to co-ordinate)
- The Economist (weekly, bloody Hell)
- The Dublin Inquirer (weekly)
- Le Canard Enchaîné (weekly, notiony)
- The Phoenix (fortnightly)
- The London Review of Books (fortnightly, aspirationally – my friend D says she is waiting anxiously for delivery, the prospect of delivery makes me anxious)
I also have an email subscription to the Browser which I really love but which arrives daily. The horror.
Are we reading all this material? Are we even close to reading it all? We are not. I cannot be spending hours on Twitter looking at Brexit, cycling, art and sarky Irish people when I have a mountain of print to get through. Not to mention the hours of podcasting awaiting my attention in the phone.
And I do like to read a book as well.
I also quite fancy the idea of my media being a bit less social.
In case you were wondering.
Viviane says
I like that you read Le Canard Enchaîné, but what does “notiony” mean ?
MT says
I like to read those things too. But when there are all these blogs to keep on top of, I just can’t find the time.
Charles says
I read the Times, a lot of blogs and the Spectator. Obviously the Sunday Times. I like Guido Fawkes.
When not screaming at the TV or the radio I do like a good book.
The Economist was a must read when I had to earn a living, as a retiree I find it a bit worthy and lacking in a sense of humour. It so lives the EU, sometimes you need to look at Junker and say HMMM, that man should go to a spa.
belgianwaffle says
Viviane, it’s a bit like having ideas above your station – the nuns were keen on the term “notions”
MT, prioritise the blogs.
Charles, the more I read periodicals, the more I like books.