This was the headline I read over a fellow commuter’s shoulder the other morning. Belgium is in crisis, in case you didn’t know. It made page 33 of the London Independent a couple of weeks ago. Yes, that big a crisis. As Angeline (and to be fair, a number of others) kindly pointed out to me, the country has been offered for sale on ebay. I am sure that this has garnered just the kind of publicity that the caretaker government welcomes
Since the national elections on June 10, Belgium has been without a government. And no sign of anything budging either. The King is rushed off his feet.
Belgium is divided into regions and communities in an extraordinarily complex way for such a small country. There are Flanders and Wallonia which are federal areas. Then the Brussels region has special status. The Flemish want to leave Belgium and take their money with them – they subsidise Wallonia, it appears. My taxi driver from the airport the other night, a Walloon with a Flemish father, said “if your lover says she wants to leave, do you forbid her? Let the Flemish go.†And unbelievable as it seems to me, it looks like they might split.
A country formed in 1830 and given a minor German princeling as King (the late Princess Charlotte’s husband, since you ask), it’s hardly a historical entity of great antiquity. In its time, it has presided over murder in the Congo – “Heart of Darkness†anyone? – and been a battlefield for two world wars – remember plucky little Belgium? It’s fair to say that it has some negative associations. The late W.G. Sebald, beloved of literati, gave it a particularly hard time, saying “And indeed, to this day one sees in Belgium a distinctive ugliness, dating from the time when the Congo colony was exploited without restraint and manifested in the macabre atmosphere of certain salons and the strikingly stunted growth of the population, such as one rarely comes across elsewhere. At all events, I well recall that on my first visit to Brussels in December 1964 I encountered more hunchbacks and lunatics than normally in a whole year.” That is unfair. I like the Belgians. I like their food. They have acres of great art and know lots about it. I am endlessly entertained by their attitude to linguistic diversity and their coastline (it is dull, they adore it). The Belgians are an enterprising bunch. It’s probably the only place in Europe where tramps routinely speak three languages. And though Belgium is largely flat, it has beautiful towns and some lovely countryside (in the South, the non-flat bit, I concede).
If Belgium dissolves, I will be sad. In a reflection on the fact that I have spent far too long in the heart of Europe, I also note that it will mean at least one extra country in the EU (and this scenario ignores the fate of Brussels) and the consequences for Council voting rights and the new Treaty will be ominous. I bet the Portuguese (the current holders of the EU’s rotating Presidency – there’s a new one every six months to keep you on your toes) are hoping that Belgium will wait until next year to disintegrate.
And in other non-dissolution of Belgium news – Michael has started vomiting again and the Princess went to bed with a temperature but, hurrah, my husband is home.
LetterB says
It made the front page of the New York Times today (the online addition at least). Must be the first time Belgium has made its front page since 1830. Curiously the article makes no mention of the impact on the EU or on Brussels. Your post was much more illuminating.
katie says
When we were in Brussels at Easter we did the Town Hall tour, and WE thought it was interesting. Though I have spent a lot of time in Africa, including 10k from the then-Zairean border, so I think that’s probably why I needed to know where the people who messed up the place had come from. I came to the conclusion that they probably didn’t know how to run a country because they had only just started running theirs.
The volunteer teachers the year before us wanted to have a beer in every country they could and were particularly keen to have “a beer in Zaire”. A friend that year was volunteering as the bilingual secretary to the Bishop of Eastern Zaire. We met up in Nairobi and she was worried she’d be bumped off her plane back as she’d put on lots of weight and they weighed the passengers as well as the luggage.
You couldn’t make it up.
In case you share my fascination, most people seem to have read The Poisonwood Bible but I really prefer The Catastrophist.
Nicholas Whyte says
the consequences for Council voting rights and the new Treaty will be ominous
I dunno, rather the reverse I suspect once the dust settles. Under the new Treaty, you need a certain % of member states to approve QMV decisions; with all these new small eastern European states joining, surely older EU members will welcome some new western European states as well? Roll on Scottish independence! (Not to mention the membership aspirations of Iceland and Norway.)
Daddy's Little Demon says
It won’t happen – the Brussels question will prevent it. They surivived a crisis in the 70s and they’ll survive this one. Tho’ I read somewhere a proposal Brussels could become a tax free city state – in which case its population would double overnight..
belgianwaffle says
Alana, you are kind, you’re my hero. I’m probably not more reliable than the NYT though. Le Soir is getting quite excited totting up references to the crisis in the foreign press.
Hmm, Nicholas, won’t it just be all more logistics for the same no. of votes?
DLD, hold your breath.